5 ms·
Correlation is not causation and is meaningless for extrapolations. The only thing it provides is interesting data to discover the causality through further stu
by 411111111111111 3y ago
Correlation is not causation and is meaningless for extrapolations. The only thing it provides is interesting data to discover the causality through further study.
But I guess you're too far gone into narcissism to understand how dumb this has gotten.
- searealist 3y agoThe claim being made is correlation.
- Gareth321 3y agoI made no claims about causation. The claim is correlation. Perhaps you should re-read the comments :)
- 411111111111111 3y agoyou're extrapolation, thus you're using it as a causation. Let me give you an example: Swiss cheese has holes, by studying its properties you can find a correlation between the size of the cheese and the total volume of holes. You do another study and find that as you increase the size of the holes the cheese, you're left with less grams of cheese. by your logic, which extrapolates between these two unrelated studies finding different correlations, you can confidently state this: more cheese correlates with more holes more holes correlates with less cheese more cheese == less cheese outstanding logic, indeed.