4 ms·
Other than RRSIG (which I would argue is not at all common), where have you seen it?
by morelisp 3y ago
Other than RRSIG (which I would argue is not at all common), where have you seen it?
- masklinn 3y agoTimestamped filenames.
- morelisp 3y agoWhenever I've seen it on timestamped filenames I've also needed sub-second precision. If that's a performance concern, a (potentially zero-padded, but realistically you don't even needed that) Unix timestamp works just as well.
- wongarsu 3y agoI've seen lots of %Y%m%d on filenames timestamped by humans. People timestamp stuff for different reasons. If you do it to avoid collisions then adding sub-second precision makes sense, but in many contexts second or even day precision is all you care about. The important point is that %Y%m%d%H%M%S is human parsable and still sorts correctly (though humans typically prefer %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S for readability)
- horse666 3y ago[dead]