3 ms·
The owner owed Bonilla money according to a contract. Separately, the owner lost money with Madoff, but the money lost was the owner’s not Bonilla’s.
by sokoloff 3y ago
The owner owed Bonilla money according to a contract. Separately, the owner lost money with Madoff, but the money lost was the owner’s not Bonilla’s.
- abirch 3y agoThe Mets were investing with Madoff in addition to the owner: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/14/sports/baseball/bernie-madoff-mets.html https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/14/sports/baseball/bernie-ma...
- sokoloff 3y agoThe key point is that Bonilla wasn’t. If I lost money with Madoff, I couldn’t tell my mortgage company that it was too bad for them that I was going to pay my mortgage with the money that was lost.