> The HN audience is for a large part in favor of nuclear energy Maybe. Do you have anything to back that up? > There's also a group that may not like it but

> The HN audience is for a large part in favor of nuclear energy Maybe. Do you have anything to back that up? > There's also a group that may not like it but sees it as a quick win in climate change That would possibly include me, but that does not allow glossing over their risks and failures, which is exactly what the parent post did. I'm not disagreeing with it, I'm asking it to be backed up with evidence. To repeat, this isn't about nuclear energy but the quality of HN posts about various subjects.