4 ms·
The problem isn't the syntax, it's the semantics. Matklad has a great post about this. You can try a bunch of different syntaxes, but rust doesn't get more read
by 3836293648 3y ago
The problem isn't the syntax, it's the semantics. Matklad has a great post about this. You can try a bunch of different syntaxes, but rust doesn't get more readable with any of them. You need to remove information (and thereby change how the langauge works) for readability to improve.
And personal preference here, Rust is, with a few exceptions, actually one of the nicer languages to read once you add/remove all the extra information that rust requires.
- 3836293648 3y agoForgot to add the link: https://matklad.github.io/2023/01/26/rusts-ugly-syntax.html https://matklad.github.io/2023/01/26/rusts-ugly-syntax.html
- anticrymactic 3y agoThis is sarcastic right? I'm struggling to tell.
- anonzzzies 3y agoI find all examples in that article more readable, outside the c++ one. (But I am personally not bothered by Rust’s syntax)