4 ms·
The biggest raise I ever got was by accident. I was making $105k and knew I was underpaid but no raise was coming so I started looking around. I told a recruite
by ohdannyboy 3y ago
The biggest raise I ever got was by accident. I was making $105k and knew I was underpaid but no raise was coming so I started looking around. I told a recruiter I was looking for "upwards of 120" and got the response "that's pretty steep
... The max for this position is $90/hr, can we make that work?" I said I'd consider it. I got that position at that rate.
I actually went back to the first company a year later but negotiated properly and got a good bump from even that. Realizing that jobs outside the Bay pay people with my skills that well was a game changer.
Edit: I should clarify this was a W2 contract position. I was an employee of a contracting company that "loaned" me to the client.
- noman-land 3y agoHilarious. Bravo. Nothing is real.
- mauvia 3y agoHey can you use per-year in both or per-hour in both for clarity? I'm not used to hourly rates so it's ambiguous to me what this means.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- ohdannyboy 3y agoThere's no perfect way to compare. The hourly job was a contract so no PTO, holidays, benefits, ect but also zero overtime. The way I laid it out valued the offer at a $165k equivalent salary at the job I was leaving.
- ericbarrett 3y ago$90/hr * 40 hrs/wk* 52 wks/yr = $187,200/yr
- jrockway 3y ago$90/hour * 40 hours/week * 50 weeks/year (2 weeks vacation!) = $180,000/year. The point the commenter is making is that they asked for $120,000/year, but the recruiter thought that was too much hearing "120" as a per-hour rate, so countered with $90/hour. Hilarity ensues. The OP got more than they were asking for because of the ambiguity.
- jaggederest 3y agoFor anyone trying to do this math, in the US, you need to reduce the equivalent pay by about 10-15% for self-employment tax if you're 1099. It's more useful to start with 1500 hours a year, as well, if you're truly contracting (not "full time paid as a contractor for one client") since you'll need to find new contracts and that will take up a surprising amount of your time. I sometimes joke that, when contracting, I spend 80% of my time billing work for client projects and the other 80% (unpaid) getting new projects, leaving me only 80% (unpaid) of my time to spend managing relationships with clients and collaborators, doing taxes, and maintaining the existing business.
- ohdannyboy 3y agoI was an employee of a contracting company so I was being taxed like an employee.
- jaggederest 3y agoWhich is the best scenario but I've seen people get burned by thinking hourly salary == hourly contracting rate :)
- jrockway 3y agoInsurance is another cost you'll have to pay yourself. I don't really know what's available for contractors, but consider health insurance, life insurance, accidental disability insurance, etc. (Dental insurance isn't really a thing. Budget $400 for your two checkups and don't get any cavities.) Also consider your retirement savings and what you're missing out on from employer 401k matches. Finally, keep an eye on cost of living and adjust your rate accordingly. The dollar is worth at least 20% less than it was 3 years ago. Charge 20% more.
- _nalply 3y agoIt this is not employment, this is somewhat low. Years ago in Europe I learnt the rule of thumb to double the amount if you work as a consultant. Companies also use this rule to consider additional expenses to salary: taxes, health insurance, office space, vacancies, unbillable hours and so on.
- arcanemachiner 3y agoHere's a rule of thumb to figure out the annual pay at a given wage (for a standard 40-hour workweek): Take your hourly wage in dollars per hour (e.g. $40), then double it (e.g. $80), then convert it to thousands (e.g. $80k). That's about what you make in a year at a given wage. e.g. $31/hr ≈ $62k/yr To turn things the other way, take the annual wage in thousands (e.g. $80k), divide it by 2 (e.g. $40k) and chop off the thousands (e.g. $40). e.g. $72k/yr ≈ $36/hr So in the story, OP was making ~$52.50/hr and wanted to make ~$60/hr, but the recruiter thought they wanted ~$120/hr but could only get them ~$90/hr. Not too shabby.
- inetknght 3y ago> Hey can you use per-year in both or per-hour in both for clarity? I'm not used to hourly rates so it's ambiguous to me what this means. Life-hack: take your hourly rate, multiply by two, add three zeroes. 90 * 2 = 180. 180 + 000 = 180k. That assumes: - 40 hour work week - 50 weeks / year (2 weeks vacation)
- scarface_74 3y agoThat’s horrible math. You at a minimum get 10 federal holidays and who accepts only two weeks PTO? That’s not taking into account W2 vs 1099 and if it’s a contract the lack of health care, 401K matching, company paid unemployment funding, time between contracts, etc.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoHah; I had the flip side of the same conversation. I was looking for jobs, had a call with a recruiter. Went something like this (paraphrased and inexact numbers): Recruiter: So what are you looking to make? Me: Well I'm making 55 now, so more than that. R: That's $55/hour? M: No, I make $55k/year. R: ... M: And now you understand why I'm looking for a new job.
- ornornor 3y agoThat guarantees yet another low salary though. Never tell how much you’re paid because your first negotiating mistake will carry on throughout your career. Instead state how much you want without basing it on your current comp. Hopefully you know that by now.