>If people regularly lose access to their belongings when there's an incident, that's not a 1 in a billion billion It was an estimate for an individual. >The

>If people regularly lose access to their belongings when there's an incident, that's not a 1 in a billion billion It was an estimate for an individual. >The premise of this conversation is that this is the regular process, right? The premise seems to be that if somewhere some policy changes, people will not feel insecure in a (purported) emergency and grab their bags. But they will, because they don't have a time machine to see it will be ok, and they don't trust the authorities, by assumption.