3 ms·
It's ok, they weren't in HD, so I would never watch them. No point in having movies that clearly have HD versions in standard definition.
by darrenkopp 15y ago
It's ok, they weren't in HD, so I would never watch them. No point in having movies that clearly have HD versions in standard definition.
- rhizome 15y ago"Streaming HD" is usually a marketing pipedream.
- learc83 15y agoIt's also usually better than "Streaming SD."
- darrenkopp 15y agoNetflix says they stream up to 5MB/s for their video quality, which looks great to me. Not as good as a blu-ray I'm sure, but still looks better than standard definition.
- kenmazy 15y agoImportant correction: Netflix's HD tops out at 5 Mb/s, not 5 MB/s. Bluray max bitrate is 54 Mb/s, but I've generally seen transcoding to 20-30 Mb/s have nearly the same quality.
- erichocean 15y agoCorrect, that's because up to 16 Mb/s is for sound. I have (and love) Blu-ray, but as much for the sound as the picture. Blu-rays have incredible audio.
- adorton 15y agoNetflix's "HD" streaming content looks great. I don't know if it's "real" HD or not, but it's better quality than their non-HD stuff.
- rhizome 15y agoI know tons of people for whom "I don't own a TV" means "I watch everything on my laptop/computer" rather than "I am opposed to the mass media." So, how well does it work over wifi?
- bengl3rt 15y agoHave you tried VUDU? Their HDX stuff looks awesome.