This is fair and I think I understand why Roberts wanted to write this, but the notion that the text of Kagan's dissent could move the public's opinion of the c

This is fair and I think I understand why Roberts wanted to write this, but the notion that the text of Kagan's dissent could move the public's opinion of the court at this moment in time is silly enough that it doesn't need to be discussed in an opinion. The court's problem isn't public "misperception," it's public perception.