> Euclid's statements worked well for 17 centuries This is a half-true. I mean, Euclid's research really worked well before Newton's research, but this is just

> Euclid's statements worked well for 17 centuries This is a half-true. I mean, Euclid's research really worked well before Newton's research, but this is just because there were no science in middle-ages. All science were pushed out by Christian religion. That begs a question, how can we segregate a real science (Euclid, Newton, you know what I mean) from real bullshits like a religion. That is what a philosophy is. Philosophy was never a bullshit but rather a chickenshit. The only reason to call Philosophy a bs is that generally religions (not only Christian one) is used to be called a part of a Philosophy domain, but of course Christians never really φιλ-ed a σοφία.