Less likely the reason is technical / cost of service (which is very cheap) and more likely he is trying to exercise leverage in pursuit of monetizing engagemen

Less likely the reason is technical / cost of service (which is very cheap) and more likely he is trying to exercise leverage in pursuit of monetizing engagement (which had already happened [1] ). It’s not that he broke the website’s tech but rather he broke the website’s business. [1] https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/twitter-pays-google-cloud-bill-fixes-relationship-report https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/twitter-pays-goog...