3 ms·
The logical flaw in that argument is assuming that home owners care about money. Many don’t, or money is not the primary motivation. Protecting their lifestyl
by firecall 3y ago
The logical flaw in that argument is assuming that home owners care about money.
Many don’t, or money is not the primary motivation.
Protecting their lifestyle location is likely a stronger motivator.
I don’t want even a low rise apartment opposite my house, or a 7/11 on my street, even if it meant my house value doubled.
I like my community and neighbours. And that is the point.
I could move for sure, if my property value doubled, but I’d be losing so much more!