>by this logic social media is perfectly in their right to block posts from political positions they disagree with, which many folks might find impinges on thei

>by this logic social media is perfectly in their right to block posts from political positions they disagree with, which many folks might find impinges on their right to free speech. Social media has been doing just that for a long time and and people have been defending it saying it is perfectly in their right to do so as a private entity speech cannot be compelled. >I don't really see how it clarifies anything really, since we still compel businesses to not restrict services based on protected classes. The entire case was about whether the law forcing the designer to provide services was "compelled speech" which would violate the first amendment