The readme is clear and also hilarious. I love this kind of thing. Anyway, this part sounds like the sort of obscure browser idiosyncrasy that I'll read about i

The readme is clear and also hilarious. I love this kind of thing. Anyway, this part sounds like the sort of obscure browser idiosyncrasy that I'll read about in some exploit writeup years from now: > What's cool is that a browser won't actually load that background image until this selector is used Intuitively it strikes me as leaky, fingerprintable behavior. I don't see any obvious problem with it, but it does vaguely remind me of those hacks that could exfiltrate browsing history with clever usage of the :visited selector.