>> Ignoring the fact that you incorrectly refer to LLVM IR as LLVM I also "incorrectly" wrote "target C" instead of "target C code". It's obvious what I meant.

>> Ignoring the fact that you incorrectly refer to LLVM IR as LLVM I also "incorrectly" wrote "target C" instead of "target C code". It's obvious what I meant. >> Comparing the 2 is nonsensical to say the least. You could have easily googled "C vs LLVM as a backend" to find a lot of interesting discussions comparing both before being so confidently incorrect