3 ms·
That’s not his “stance” on vaccines. That may have been an off-hand comment he made somewhere, but his stance which he reiterates over and over is that vaccines
by tboyd47 3y ago
That’s not his “stance” on vaccines. That may have been an off-hand comment he made somewhere, but his stance which he reiterates over and over is that vaccines should be safety tested. Totally sensible policy that seems like it should be already in place.
Your comment proves my point, though. He can clarify until he’s blue in the face, and people will ignore that and remember the zany things that have been attributed to him, even if he never said them.
- dragonwriter 3y ago> but his stance which he reiterates over and over is that vaccines should be safety tested. Totally sensible policy that seems like it should be already in place. Vaccines are safety tested, so if his actual stance was just that that should be but is not the case, he would still be a liar spreading dangerous misinformation. But selectively excluding his most extreme claims as not being part of his “stance” is, well, another form of deliberate misinformation.