Whether or not big tech censorship is currently legal, I think a more interesting question is should it be? Should this small handful of unelected people be ab

Whether or not big tech censorship is currently legal, I think a more interesting question is should it be? Should this small handful of unelected people be able to wield so much power over the country? If one of them (or even worse, a few of them in collusion) decided that they wanted a particular outcome in an election, it seems like they'd be pretty well situated to make it happen. This power used to rest with the legacy media companies, but now it's shifting. What's the right thing to allow here (if you pretend for a second that it's up to us)?