> Just because something is "artificial" doesn't mean bad. I’d be willing to bet in more than 50% of cases it does. > Source? Didn’t WHO or some similar orga

> Just because something is "artificial" doesn't mean bad. I’d be willing to bet in more than 50% of cases it does. > Source? Didn’t WHO or some similar organisation just start officially recommending against them? I haven’t actually read any of the research on this, I’ve just taken my advice from people who have. My personal source is an argument from nature along the lines of “if we didn’t need artificial sweeteners for 300,000 years, we probably won’t need them now”.