4 ms·
We at Adaptive[1] extensively use hurl.dev to automate our testing. All our internal product flows are tested via hurl. It is the best thing that we have ever i
by debarshri 3y ago
We at Adaptive[1] extensively use hurl.dev to automate our testing. All our internal product flows are tested via hurl. It is the best thing that we have ever implemented in our org to stabilize the product. Everytime before we deploy, we run bunch of automated tests written in hurl, for onboarding, signups, critical flows etc. That are containerized and can run in parallel. We have been building internal tools around hurl.dev too.
I really would recommend this tool. Nice thing is even analyst and business users can build these tests as it is fairly easy to pickup.
[1] https://adaptive.live https://adaptive.live
- sedatk 3y agoDoes it support OAuth flow out of the box, or do you need hardcoded tokens for that? (I checked the docs, couldn't find anything about it)
- debarshri 3y agoTo my best knowledge, it does not support oauth flow out of the box. This is also where we built some custom tooling around hurl.
- klysm 3y agoIt seems reasonable to not support all the different auth schemes though. There are so many implementation quirks that it would be a huge burden to do that as part of the hurl project
- digikata 3y agoIt doesn't support that out of the box, but you you can specify or capture values for variables like tokens in the hurl tests. https://hurl.dev/docs/manual.html#variable https://hurl.dev/docs/manual.html#variable https://hurl.dev/docs/capturing-response.html https://hurl.dev/docs/capturing-response.html
- JeremyNT 3y agoI'm curious as to why you use this standalone tool versus a full fledged test suite. It seems like a browser based approach (like Selenium) would be far more powerful and overall useful in a testing context.