3 ms·
Incorrectly identifying logical fallacies doesn't answer my question. The path arriving to the outcomes is different, but the outcomes are the same. My questio
by infamouscow 3y ago
Incorrectly identifying logical fallacies doesn't answer my question.
The path arriving to the outcomes is different, but the outcomes are the same. My question is what, exactly, is the distinction because I struggle to see one.
More concretely, if someone took a COVID vaccine and had a terrible allergic reaction, doctors will strongly advise against further vaccination. Should that person's immutable physical traits justify discrimination against them?
- olliej 3y ago> More concretely, if someone took a COVID vaccine and had a terrible allergic reaction, doctors will strongly advise against further vaccination. Should that person's immutable physical traits justify discrimination against them? Are there safety concerns? then yes. We don't let people with epilepsy drive, despite that being an immutable characteristic.
- infamouscow 3y agoI think there is a lot of nuance about safety and we probably disagree on the specifics, but I appreciate and thank you for answering and helping elucidate my understanding :)