3 ms·
I don't see the point in continuing this conversation, as you don't engage in a good faith. YouTube is not free. It's ad/subscription supported. Just because t
by justapassenger 3y ago
I don't see the point in continuing this conversation, as you don't engage in a good faith.
YouTube is not free. It's ad/subscription supported. Just because they didn't fight ad blocking in the past doesn't make it free.
- dahart 3y ago> YouTube is not free. Hahaha you need to tell YouTube that, not me. Lol why are accusations of bad faith always made in bad faith? I guess you just don’t want to address your own inconsistency? You didn’t answer the question of why you consider sneaking into a paid concert to be not stealing yet claim you must pay for YouTube somehow. That makes no sense. You could be fined or jailed for sneaking into a concert because it’s illegal, it’s stealing by definition. You cannot be fined for not watching YouTube ads. What, exactly, is your definition of free? Does YouTube agree with your definition, do they say it’s not free? Where? Can you link to language that outlines the non-premium YouTube payment procedure? Can you demonstrate that failure to pay could result in legal consequences? YouTube is in fact free in the sense that it does not cost the viewer money to watch. And unlike concert tickets or any other paid product, there is no legal obligation or expectation to “pay” for YT with time or attention, and there is no tracking or record of any such payment. Just because they want you to watch ads while not asking for money does not make YouTube not free.