While I support the ruling for the abstract basis you describe, to say it has nothing in the concrete world to do with samesex weddings is disingenuous. Do you

While I support the ruling for the abstract basis you describe, to say it has nothing in the concrete world to do with samesex weddings is disingenuous. Do you presume the plaintiff would have brought such a suit over something that echoed her beliefs? Unless you can reasonably attribute such conviction of principle to her, she cannot be said to have brought the suit on such principles, only that her argument was parallel to such principles.