7 ms·

Is... any of that coded in law somewhere or illegal? "I don't want it to be available for training AI" is a perfectly reasonable personal preference. We can di

Is... any of that coded in law somewhere or illegal? "I don't want it to be available for training AI" is a perfectly reasonable personal preference. We can discuss whether it's selfish or not, whether others agree or not, etc. But this is a lawsuit. What makes it illegal for OpenAI to use your content? Like, is there some license you've put up on your content that disallows it? Is there anything that's relevant to the case at hand?

imchillyb 3y ago
> https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/privacy-security/childrens-privacy https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/privacy-security/child... > The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) gives parents control over what information websites can collect from their kids. The COPPA Rule puts additional protections in place and streamlines other procedures that companies covered by the rule need to follow. The COPPA FAQs can help keep your company COPPA compliant. Learn about the COPPA Safe Harbor Program and about organizations the FTC has approved to implement safe harbor programs. You can also get information about ways to get verifiable parental consent– including new methods the Commission has approved – and the process for seeking approval for new methods. There's one. There are similar laws in Europe. The AI scraped, utilized, kept, keeps... data on children. Parents did not consent. Children /can't/ consent. The AI use of such data is not only illegal but could end up with people being jailed over it.
- amanaplanacanal 3y ago
  I assume the parents consented to have that information on a website, or it couldn’t have been scraped in the first place. They may be suing the wrong party here.
  - martin8412 3y ago
    The kids could have done so without the consent of their guardian. It cannot be used, unless consent is given beforehand.
JohnFen 3y ago
I never said it was illegal. I was responding to the implication that because you put something publicly on the web, it's somehow ridiculous to object to certain uses of it. As to the legality, that remains unknown until a court makes a ruling. I suspect that this lawsuit will go nowhere, but I'm just speculating along with everyone else.
- signatoremo 3y ago
  Of course as the data’s owner you can object to anything. Who is to say that you are not allowed to hate certain practice? On the other hand, you can’t prevent people from using your data if you put it out in public without condition (in the form of some acceptable licenses). As an analogy, if you put a picture of your living room in the sidewalk, you can’t prevent me from looking at it, study it, when I walk by. I may even benefit from it by copying your style or decoration. You may however cover it, with a warning. I’d clearly violate your terms if I still look at it against your will, although I may not violate any laws.
  - __loam 3y ago
    The problem is that a lot of that public data is protected by copyright.
    - amanaplanacanal 3y ago
      It’s not obvious to me that using public data to train AI is a violation of copyright. Many are claiming it is, but as far as I know the courts haven’t weighed in on it yet.
tourmalinetaco 3y ago
One could argue copyright, but you’d have to prove this was copyright infringement. Which I don’t believe the law has caught up with the answer to that.
ForestCritter 3y ago
Medical data and data about children have very specific protections. The article says these were accessed without permission. If a lab tech dropped my lab results on the floor and you picked them up, it would not give you the right to store and use my information.
- xen2xen1 3y ago
  How were they accessed without permission if they were protected? Is that the fault of the AI folks, or those sworn to protect the information? Unfortunate and bad, but if it's up there in the open I'm more worried about the fact that's it's available than the fact that an AI scraped it. If an AI can figure it out, so can multiple bad actors.
  - martin8412 3y ago
    The data can have been leaked illegally and put on the internet. That doesn't mean you can use it. As an EU citizen, some random company can't use PII related to me if I don't give consent or revoke my consent. They'll have to remove it or face a huge fine. The law doesn't care about the cost for your company to comply.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]
diffeomorphism 3y ago
What makes it legal? If you find code on GitHub without a license, then this does not mean "public domain". It means "the author has given permission for you to view this, but nothing more". Arguably using it for training counts as "more". So my question would be "what license entitles OpenAi to use my content"? It could be that as part of the user agreement of the website you gave some rights to the website and they sold it on to OpenAi, could be fair use, could be "does not count as 'more'",... . Bad analogy: For money laundering we have similar rules. If you suddenly appear with a large amount of money/data, then the obligation is on you to show that it is clean, not on others to show that it is dirty. You can disagree with that (innocent until proven guilty etc.), but it is not clear cut which way around things should be.

imchillyb 3y ago

> https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/privacy-security/childrens-privacy https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/privacy-security/child... > The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) gives parents control over what information websites can collect from their kids. The COPPA Rule puts additional protections in place and streamlines other procedures that companies covered by the rule need to follow. The COPPA FAQs can help keep your company COPPA compliant. Learn about the COPPA Safe Harbor Program and about organizations the FTC has approved to implement safe harbor programs. You can also get information about ways to get verifiable parental consent– including new methods the Commission has approved – and the process for seeking approval for new methods. There's one. There are similar laws in Europe. The AI scraped, utilized, kept, keeps... data on children. Parents did not consent. Children /can't/ consent. The AI use of such data is not only illegal but could end up with people being jailed over it.

amanaplanacanal 3y ago
I assume the parents consented to have that information on a website, or it couldn’t have been scraped in the first place. They may be suing the wrong party here.
- martin8412 3y ago
  The kids could have done so without the consent of their guardian. It cannot be used, unless consent is given beforehand.

JohnFen 3y ago

I never said it was illegal. I was responding to the implication that because you put something publicly on the web, it's somehow ridiculous to object to certain uses of it. As to the legality, that remains unknown until a court makes a ruling. I suspect that this lawsuit will go nowhere, but I'm just speculating along with everyone else.

signatoremo 3y ago
Of course as the data’s owner you can object to anything. Who is to say that you are not allowed to hate certain practice? On the other hand, you can’t prevent people from using your data if you put it out in public without condition (in the form of some acceptable licenses). As an analogy, if you put a picture of your living room in the sidewalk, you can’t prevent me from looking at it, study it, when I walk by. I may even benefit from it by copying your style or decoration. You may however cover it, with a warning. I’d clearly violate your terms if I still look at it against your will, although I may not violate any laws.
- __loam 3y ago
  The problem is that a lot of that public data is protected by copyright.
  - amanaplanacanal 3y ago
    It’s not obvious to me that using public data to train AI is a violation of copyright. Many are claiming it is, but as far as I know the courts haven’t weighed in on it yet.

tourmalinetaco 3y ago

One could argue copyright, but you’d have to prove this was copyright infringement. Which I don’t believe the law has caught up with the answer to that.

ForestCritter 3y ago

Medical data and data about children have very specific protections. The article says these were accessed without permission. If a lab tech dropped my lab results on the floor and you picked them up, it would not give you the right to store and use my information.

xen2xen1 3y ago
How were they accessed without permission if they were protected? Is that the fault of the AI folks, or those sworn to protect the information? Unfortunate and bad, but if it's up there in the open I'm more worried about the fact that's it's available than the fact that an AI scraped it. If an AI can figure it out, so can multiple bad actors.
- martin8412 3y ago
  The data can have been leaked illegally and put on the internet. That doesn't mean you can use it. As an EU citizen, some random company can't use PII related to me if I don't give consent or revoke my consent. They'll have to remove it or face a huge fine. The law doesn't care about the cost for your company to comply.

deleted 3y ago

[deleted]

diffeomorphism 3y ago

What makes it legal? If you find code on GitHub without a license, then this does not mean "public domain". It means "the author has given permission for you to view this, but nothing more". Arguably using it for training counts as "more". So my question would be "what license entitles OpenAi to use my content"? It could be that as part of the user agreement of the website you gave some rights to the website and they sold it on to OpenAi, could be fair use, could be "does not count as 'more'",... . Bad analogy: For money laundering we have similar rules. If you suddenly appear with a large amount of money/data, then the obligation is on you to show that it is clean, not on others to show that it is dirty. You can disagree with that (innocent until proven guilty etc.), but it is not clear cut which way around things should be.