3 ms·
Of course it did. This is how AI is trained and becomes profitable with current business models. It uses your content without paying you for it to generate new
by blondie9x 3y ago
Of course it did. This is how AI is trained and becomes profitable with current business models. It uses your content without paying you for it to generate new content.
AI can be one of the most powerful forces in the world but it needs to pay content creators. If people stop creating new content for AI to train on then it will get stale.
AI can be the product of our dreams and our passions but we need to make sure those who choose to create and share content to train it are treated fairly and compensated when applicable.
- kmeisthax 3y agoThis isn't a copyright lawsuit. Those lawsuits are already in progress. This lawsuit is alleging that OpenAI trained GPT-3 and -4 on inadvertently published information. Web crawlers are very good at finding things you wouldn't expect to be public; there's techniques you can use to, say, abuse Google to search for such things.
- tourmalinetaco 3y agoWhen companies stop making “document1.pdf” publicly facing, while expecting “document2.pdf” to remain confidential, then we can talk.
- CookieCrisp 3y agoI'm fine with talking to them now - I don't personally find your argument very compelling; there is almost always a step further that someone wont consider that someone else will think is obvious.
- Al0neStar 3y agoSo if i enumerate a host and find a git dump that includes private api keys i can do whatever i want with them?
- __loam 3y agoAccessing a system you don't have permission to access because it's misconfigured is still illegal lmao. People have gone to jail for doing exactly this.
- visarga 3y agoAI should be a tool for creators and the benefits come from its use. Instead of trying to own ideas, creators should only protect the unique way these ideas are expressed, that's what copyright should cover.