It's in focus because these are being used as test cases to define the boundaries of the law. We had a similar one in the UK, which went all the way to our Sup

It's in focus because these are being used as test cases to define the boundaries of the law. We had a similar one in the UK, which went all the way to our Supreme Court: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/10/uk-supreme-court-backs-bakery-that-refused-to-make-gay-wedding-cake https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/oct/10/uk-supreme-c... The judges agreed with your view too: > The bakers could not refuse to supply their goods to Mr Lee because he was a gay man or supported gay marriage, but that is quite different from obliging them to supply a cake iced with a message with which they profoundly disagreed. Which seems to me also a very reasonable line to draw, in terms of freedom of expression.