4 ms·
The supreme court isn't supposed to issue advisory rulings, but that's what they've done here. More legislating from the bench.
by cogman10 3y ago
The supreme court isn't supposed to issue advisory rulings, but that's what they've done here. More legislating from the bench.
- gnicholas 3y agoDid CO ever claim that there was no standing? I don't see a reference to "standing" or "controversy" (from the phrase "case or controversy") in in the opinions. I assume that if standing were an issue (as it was in the student loan forgiveness case), it would have been briefed, argued, and discussed by at least one of the justices.
- rs999gti 3y ago> More legislating from the bench. This is why the USA needs term limits for the house and senate. Those politicians are too lazy to make any laws or not willing to hurt their re-election potential that they are passing legislation to the judicial branch. This makes the Supreme Court the ultimate arbiter on matters, which causes the president and Senate to pack the court with biased judges.