4 ms·
> It's a debranded clone that by definition cannot even have a single bugfix that isn't in RHEL. Not necessarily. They could easily have an optional repository
by cesarb 3y ago
> It's a debranded clone that by definition cannot even have a single bugfix that isn't in RHEL.
Not necessarily. They could easily have an optional repository for "bugfixes that aren't in RHEL". Those who want bug-for-bug compatibility with RHEL for some reason could simply not enable that repository.
- mackca 3y agoThat repo would undercut the entire purpose of Rocky, which in their wiki state > Rocky Linux is a community enterprise Operating System designed to be 100% bug-for-bug compatible with Enterprise Linux. [1] [1] https://wiki.rockylinux.org/ https://wiki.rockylinux.org/
- dev_daftly 3y agoAt that point, why wouldn't the user just be using centos stream?