3 ms·
The damage is corporations could now determine whether they classify downstream use of open source code as "valuable" or "not valuable", and determine (accordin
by geerlingguy 3y ago
The damage is corporations could now determine whether they classify downstream use of open source code as "valuable" or "not valuable", and determine (according to their own rubrics) whether to effectively end the open source gravy train in their own ecosystem, or be a member of the open source community and share alike.
Despite every attempt by Red Hat employees to call out CentOS Stream as being "Red Hat sources", it is not. If they wish to participate in the open source ecosystem, they can't coerce customers (paid or not) into a particular (very proprietary) usage pattern with their software. No matter how many tens/hundreds/thousands of employees they hire to code for open source projects.
- mackca 3y agoSo Red Hat is saying that CentOS Stream is how RHEL is built, you are saying it is not. Can you show the difference in packages from CentOS Stream and RHEL? Rocky says they pull packages from CentOS Stream, and with their project goal remaining 1:1 binary compatibility then that must be the case.
- geerlingguy 3y agoSo far I have talked to two individual developers who have not been able to reproduce a RHEL 9.2 build only using what's available in Stream.