4 ms·
The title is ambiguous; you could read it as "photos taken by terrible real estate agents".
by oneeyedpigeon 3y ago
The title is ambiguous; you could read it as "photos taken by terrible real estate agents".
- tokai 3y agoThe byline is "Inexplicably bad property photographs". So its clearly the photographs that are supposed to be bad. But almost all of the photographs are objectively not bad. They are exposed and framed correctly. Showing some (mostly bad) real estate.
- oneeyedpigeon 3y agoI took it to mean "these are bad photographs because they fulfil their purpose (selling houses) badly". That covers poor photographs AND poor properties. I’d argue the agents are also poor (in the not-good-at-the-job sense) themselves, as a result. A photograph can be technically perfect and still bad.