3 ms·
This is entertaining, however in most cases it's not the photos that are terrible.
by aktuel 3y ago
This is entertaining, however in most cases it's not the photos that are terrible.
- oneeyedpigeon 3y agoThe title is ambiguous; you could read it as "photos taken by terrible real estate agents".
- tokai 3y agoThe byline is "Inexplicably bad property photographs". So its clearly the photographs that are supposed to be bad. But almost all of the photographs are objectively not bad. They are exposed and framed correctly. Showing some (mostly bad) real estate.
- oneeyedpigeon 3y agoI took it to mean "these are bad photographs because they fulfil their purpose (selling houses) badly". That covers poor photographs AND poor properties. I’d argue the agents are also poor (in the not-good-at-the-job sense) themselves, as a result. A photograph can be technically perfect and still bad.
- tgv 3y agoIt's more the captions than the photos. E.g., the one that says "this is where the magic fails to happen", under a drab bedroom with a double bed, is a fairly accurate picture of the current state of that room. It also has a pillow on the bed that says "the best grandma in the world". Not exactly the most exciting thing, making the caption a bit cringy. Unless grandma is a failed witch.
- dwater 3y agohttps://terriblerealestateagentphotos.com/post/709175406418411520 https://terriblerealestateagentphotos.com/post/7091754064184... There's also erotic wall art, which in my mind an agent that gave a shit would have removed for the listing.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- astura 3y agoDid you miss the "art" on the walls?