> society would rather have no drugs at all than investing in safe and controlled access. But this isn’t what happens, which is my entire point. Banning drugs

> society would rather have no drugs at all than investing in safe and controlled access. But this isn’t what happens, which is my entire point. Banning drugs doesn’t result in no drugs. It results in drugs going underground where they cause greater harm to society. Prohibition doesn’t work - we figured that out almost 100 years ago. Continuing to push illegality is purely ideological at this point.