3 ms·
On the other hand, this shows GFW authors are more, and more considerate of the collateral damage, which is a surprise. It seems GFW has indeed became good enou
by baybal2 3y ago
On the other hand, this shows GFW authors are more, and more considerate of the collateral damage, which is a surprise. It seems GFW has indeed became good enough to frustrate casual users to trigger uproar when windows update, or AWS ip ranges go belly up, or something.
VPN authors should chose the maximum collateral damage strategy to frustrate GFW authors, make China as close as possible to completely cutting off outside internet. No need to completely evade fingerprinting, instead, do the complete opposite, and try to mimic common protocols, and critical applications as much as possible.
- ixwt 3y agoFrom my understanding, this is what TOR did for some time. They tried to make it look as close as possible to HTTPS.