4 ms·
It's not valves job to police game assets. If it were then they should be removing plenty of other games. They don't, because they don't look and don't care. Th
by devwastaken 3y ago
It's not valves job to police game assets. If it were then they should be removing plenty of other games. They don't, because they don't look and don't care. This is yet again more AIphobia.
Under u.s. law you don't need to prove rights for content used in this way. It's transformative and does not replicate the heart of the originals work, therefore it's protected under fair use. AI generated content cannot be copyrighted, so they cannot claim ownership regardless.
- cubefox 3y agoThis is correct, see: https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/ai-generator-art-text-us-copyright-policy-1234661683/amp/ https://www.artnews.com/art-news/news/ai-generator-art-text-... The AI generated images are not protected by copyright because they are not authored by a human. Whether or not it is legal to train a model on copyrighted images is irrelevant for this. So it seems clear that Valve made the wrong call here.