3 ms·
Showing the title is "borrowing" content? How are you supposed to refer to the site without the title? The raw URL? Imagine if book publishers sued bookstores f
by warning26 3y ago
Showing the title is "borrowing" content? How are you supposed to refer to the site without the title? The raw URL? Imagine if book publishers sued bookstores for showing titles of their books.
- GeekyBear 3y ago> How are you supposed to refer to the site without the title? By following the example I gave previously and only using the name of the news site and not any of it's content? > Hire a human being to write headlines in their own words and then link to articles in the press discussing that story. > "Man Bites Dog" More discussion: CBC, National Post, Toronto Star, CTV, etc. In that example, "Man Bites Dog" was the headline written by an employee on Google's dime, and then you have a list of links that do not "borrow" any of the target website's text or images. Since it's common case law that a mere link is not illegal, I don't see how a law banning a link (without using content that does not belong to you) would stand up in Canadian courts given the free speech guarantees in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.