3 ms·
How would you position this vs the Modular/Mojo approach which aims to relieve similar pain points.
by nologic01 3y ago
How would you position this vs the Modular/Mojo approach which aims to relieve similar pain points.
- daveguy 3y agoLooks like Runhouse is FOSS (Apache 2.0) and you get to choose your own infrastructure. I will try out Runhouse. Mojo wants me to send them my info to get started.
- voz_ 3y agoWhat is the mojo approach?
- donnygreenberg 3y agoThat's a good question. I actually love the Mojo concept, but see it as very different. They're creating a portable acceleration option in Python proper, while we're trying to make it so you can easily ship around such code to different infra. You can see them or other DSLs like Ray as handling "inside the cluster" while we're focused on solving "outside the cluster." That's what I've picked up from their marketing but could be missing something. In general making code itself more portable is great (which is the objective of many ML compilers) and will make Runhouse even more valuable, because the ability to take the same code and send it to different places shines when those different places can be different compute types.