> Because you can't have your cake and eat it too. If Google can't cache the whole article, they can't provide search for the article. Yeah, this is exactly th

> Because you can't have your cake and eat it too. If Google can't cache the whole article, they can't provide search for the article. Yeah, this is exactly the point that such a regulation would bring up. Businesses can't expect Google to both use your data and not use your content in their search results. If you say "I don't want Google's indexers to read my content and surface it to people that haven't clicked my site", that's fine -- Google won't be able to index your content (as requested), though, so your site won't appear in search results. This seems like a situation where the cards are much more clearly on the table, and my expectation is that no reasonable business would choose to have Google not index their full content.