4 ms·
> I just saw the stats from a medical school— I believe it was UCSF but correct me if I’m wrong— Given that affirmative action was banned at UC schools in 1996
by elishah 3y ago
> I just saw the stats from a medical school— I believe it was UCSF but correct me if I’m wrong—
Given that affirmative action was banned at UC schools in 1996, I suspect that you're mistaken about at least the school in question.
Which, it should be noted, means that we've accrued ~25 years of data about the results of such a ban. And the answer is that it's bad: https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-10-31/california-banned-affirmative-action-uc-struggles-for-diversity https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-10-31/californ...
- ekam 3y agoAffirmative action was banned across California and the article you cited itself says that the problem is only with UCs and not CSUs. The reasons proposed (distance, costs, number of UCs vs CSUs) intuitively ring true to me. Today's decision is obviously correct from a legal standpoint (equal protection clause bans all race-based discrimination) but the difference between CSUs and UCs actually suggests a positive path forward for helping boost Black and Latino enrollment in UCs- step one might be building a lot more and making them cheaper.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]