4 ms·
This is not true and is more nuanced than you’re making it seem. See title 9 and the continued existence of schools like Wellesley college.
by endisneigh 3y ago
This is not true and is more nuanced than you’re making it seem. See title 9 and the continued existence of schools like Wellesley college.
- s1artibartfast 3y agoI agree that there is nuance, but I think this is still accurate in terms of the ruling. Protected class discrimination is illegal in the absence of the compelling interest. There are still tons of exemptions and hypocrisy, but in general you typical public university can not discriminate admissions based on sex, gender identity, national origin, age, disability, genetic information, ect. If a public university instituted a no-gays or no-immigrants admission policy it would be quickly struck down under the status quo, so there is no need to discuss that. Im not sure how single gender schools fit into the whole scheme. is there a specific case about Wellesley I should look up? I didnt see anything about title 9 challenges on Wikipedia.