4 ms·

I'm pretty sure they only went because the CEO/owner went along. Seems like a reasonable assumption to make as a customer that the CEO wouldn't risk his life.

• HWR_14 3y ago
  Again, they don't have to make assumptions. They can have their own engineers provide due diligence. These are people who can trivially afford that level of care on an experimental submersible.
  • flangola7 3y ago
    Making the argument that customers should have had their own engineers conduct an assessment if they wanted safety is definitely a solid plan if your goal is to be torn to sheds by the judge/jury.
    • HWR_14 3y ago
      I'm sure the legal case before the judge is "check page 2, subsection 4 of our indemnity clause" and the case is tossed before it even gets to the jury. I'm specifically talking about people trying risky things. And yes, billionaires who want to risk their lives on experimental deadly craft should hire engineers.