3 ms·
The point is, the AI must know about the technology. Until now they have exposed important limitations IMHO (wrong syntax, invented knowledge), which leads to
by madduci 3y ago
The point is, the AI must know about the technology.
Until now they have exposed important limitations IMHO (wrong syntax, invented knowledge), which leads to more headaches than simply reading the documentation of a particular framework/library/language.
In my opinion, it's nice to know that AI is there, but I personally don't find it, at the current state of art, trustworthy. On the other side, it's totally perfect for preparing documentations, attempt to create tests or doing translations.
- seanthemon 3y agoThose limitations and lack of trustworthines are the exact same as dealing with a human, or even reading code from a forum or SO even. I used gpt4 to generate a pretty complex application and worked out of the box, anything that didn't I asked it to modify, and even adding large features it succeeded, i'm currently using that app as a toolbelt daily driver, i've extended it with the help of gpt to give me ideas, sources and more code for tedious tasks. I think you've placed limitations before exploring boundaries