2 ms·
>... Gross negligence or recklessness: The California Supreme Court recently held that releases are valid only to protect defendants from being sued for neglige
by ramesh31 3y ago
>... Gross negligence or recklessness: The California Supreme Court recently held that releases are valid only to protect defendants from being sued for negligence. They are invalid if you can prove that the other party's conduct was more than negligent, e.g., gross negligence or recklessness.
That's the key here. Regardless of acceptance of risk, gross negligence cannot be excused. If this were a legit operation using a certified vessel, we'd be having an entirely different conversation. But what Rush was doing is the very definition of recklessness.
- voxic11 3y agoWe don't know for sure yet why the sub imploded. Its still possible that it was due to some design or manufacturing defect no one foresaw, in which case recklessness would not apply. But I agree it most likely imploded due to one of the design defects that Oceangate was warned about and recklessly ignored.