3 ms·
Sounds a lot like the reasoning that lead to the Challenger disaster.
by LorenPechtel 3y ago
Sounds a lot like the reasoning that lead to the Challenger disaster.
- wkat4242 3y agoIt was a bit different. With the Challenger they started with a target (astronomical) reliability rating, and then calculated back to how each part would have to perform. The problem was they didn't actually verify this under real world conditions. With this sub the number of safe operation cycles wasn't even part of the design considerations.