4 ms·
That’s a reductive view of the laws and cases involved. The cakeshop case was about compelled speech, and the conservative justices’ politics are not “neocon”.
by catiopatio 3y ago
That’s a reductive view of the laws and cases involved.
The cakeshop case was about compelled speech, and the conservative justices’ politics are not “neocon”.
- fzeroracer 3y agoDiscrimination is discrimination, no matter how you try to slice it. The compelled speech argument was a line of bullshit to discriminate against customers because it all hinged on their religious right to discriminate against people they did not like. That's the crux of it all.