4 ms·
If you take a photograph of someone else’s copyrighted work, that doesn’t make it a new piece. For example, look at how Valve is rejecting games that use AI gen
by MattRix 3y ago
If you take a photograph of someone else’s copyrighted work, that doesn’t make it a new piece. For example, look at how Valve is rejecting games that use AI generated art: https://twitter.com/simoncarless/status/1674285134374404096 https://twitter.com/simoncarless/status/1674285134374404096
- mensetmanusman 3y agoThat's true, which is why the photography analogy holds. It makes sense you can't clone exact types of art, but mixing and mashing two or more to make something totally new and derivative is fine.
- MattRix 3y agoOk but how mixed and mashed does it need to be before it’s not considered derivative? And how do you know that the thing the AI generated isn’t a clone?