4 ms·
Not bad but very much focused on the optimising the "front-end" of delivery. My experience is generally optimising the back-end, for instance I notice you did n
by quattrofan 15y ago
Not bad but very much focused on the optimising the "front-end" of delivery. My experience is generally optimising the back-end, for instance I notice you did no real digging to find out why your old server was slow, was it CPU bound? Memory bound? IO bound? In a lot of cases you can get big performance increases without expensive new hardware, the golden rule here is CACHE EVERYTHING. A good caching plan, a product like memcached and cheap hardware with lots of memory can often well outperform a much more expensive multi-core rig.
- joshfraser 15y agoThe reason for that is that Performance Golden rule which states that 80-90% of the end-user response time is spent on the frontend. This rule turns out to be surprisingly accurate across the internet. http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2012/02/10/the-performance-golden-rule/ http://www.stevesouders.com/blog/2012/02/10/the-performance-...
- quattrofan 15y agoActually I've not seen this, excellent, thanks for posting