> Let's both hope I've got their character wrong and we get to see the truth someday. How would we ever "get to see the truth someday" on your conspiracy theor

> Let's both hope I've got their character wrong and we get to see the truth someday. How would we ever "get to see the truth someday" on your conspiracy theory, if the truth happens to be that there's not actually an intentional remote code exploit? That's my point: you've made yourself immune from the facts. You can't ever be proved wrong, by your own criteria of "proof", which posits that Apple always has the ability to avoid detection.