3 ms·
You're mixing things up. The hull that was downrated after inspection was a different submarine. The guy who was fired was an executive, not an engineer on th
by ajross 3y ago
You're mixing things up. The hull that was downrated after inspection was a different submarine. The guy who was fired was an executive, not an engineer on the project (no idea about his background), and while he expressed concerns over safety he did not cite the use of carbon fiber as a problem (or at least it hasn't been reported that he did).
Which is all to say: basing your opinions on this stuff on easily-consumed, tempting pseudoanalysis clickbait is a terrible way to figure out what went wrong. And in particular putting your ducks in this carbon fiber nonsense instead of "they probably just put a hole in the wrong place" seems poorly grounded to me.
- fsckboy 3y agoJust want to say, I appreciate your contributions here, from one grizzled engineer to ... well, I don't know if you're grizzled, but I can tell you're a good engineer. Good engineering isn't a popularity contest, it's a thoroughness contest.
- mustacheemperor 3y ago>while he expressed concerns over safety he did not cite the use of carbon fiber as a problem (or at least it hasn't been reported that he did). That’s exactly what I have seen reported. >But Lochridge, according to the suit, raised concerns about the design of the submersible's hull, particularly that it was made of carbon fiber instead of a metallic composition. https://abcnews.go.com/US/lawsuit-alleged-flaws-titanic-submersible-now-missing/story?id=100251012 https://abcnews.go.com/US/lawsuit-alleged-flaws-titanic-subm...