> It is not intended to be v8. There is already a UUIDv8. It's defined as vendor-specific UUID. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-uuid

> It is not intended to be v8. There is already a UUIDv8. It's defined as vendor-specific UUID. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-uuid-format-04.html#name-uuid-version-8 https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-peabody-dispatch-new-u... > Some example situations in which UUIDv8 usage could occur: > An implementation would like to embed extra information within the UUID other than what is defined in this document. Isn't that exactly what you are doing?