2 ms·
> CSAM does carry emotional weight. I never argued it doesn't. > Your entire argument is that since privacy measures are already loose then its okay to make t
by camhart 3y ago
> CSAM does carry emotional weight.
I never argued it doesn't.
> Your entire argument is that since privacy measures are already loose then its okay to make them looser for "the children".
Where did I make this argument? (hint: I didn't)
- Al0neStar 3y agoPrivacy is binary you either have it or you dont and to argue that there exists a "balance" is disingenuous.
- camhart 3y agoThat isn't reality. You give up privacy all the time in exchange for things. And even with e2ee you don't "have" privacy guaranteed.
- JPws_Prntr_Fngr 3y agoThe disingenuousness is the point. You're trying to rationalize with authoritarians, who do not argue in good faith.