4 ms·
CSAM does carry emotional weight. Your entire argument is that since privacy measures are already loose then its okay to make them looser for "the children".
by Al0neStar 3y ago
CSAM does carry emotional weight.
Your entire argument is that since privacy measures are already loose then its okay to make them looser for "the children".
- camhart 3y ago> CSAM does carry emotional weight. I never argued it doesn't. > Your entire argument is that since privacy measures are already loose then its okay to make them looser for "the children". Where did I make this argument? (hint: I didn't)
- Al0neStar 3y agoPrivacy is binary you either have it or you dont and to argue that there exists a "balance" is disingenuous.
- camhart 3y agoThat isn't reality. You give up privacy all the time in exchange for things. And even with e2ee you don't "have" privacy guaranteed.
- JPws_Prntr_Fngr 3y agoThe disingenuousness is the point. You're trying to rationalize with authoritarians, who do not argue in good faith.